The definitive resource for news, events and reviews of great regional food from around the country
 
Restaurants Recipes Digest Forums Merchandise FAQ Maps Insider


The Cook Beats The Meat

Posted by Bruce Bilmes and Sue Boyle , January 28, 2010 16:19

untitled

Roadfood.com asked the question, What's the Most Important Feature In Great BBQ?  Roadfood.com readers made it a two-way race, and The Cook edged out The Meat by eight votes out of the 955 cast.  There are a few ways to interpret the question, any and all of them valid (there’s only so much space for the poll – no explanations possible!).  Here’s how we see it: if you came up with a great barbecue sauce, how much would that define the great barbecue?  Could you take just about any meat and any pitmaster and turn the results into great barbecue through the use of the right sauce?  For us, at least, the answer to that particular question is no.

We’d say the same thing about the setting and the rub.  The other three are trickier.  Can you even have barbecue without wood?  Plenty of restaurants serve something called barbecue that never saw wood smoke.  Some of it can be pretty decent, too, but great?  Never, not in our opinion.  Which is why we voted for wood.  Of course, you can’t really have barbecue without the meat, but we don’t see the question as a choice between meat or no meat.  Rather, it’s a question of which particular cut of cow or pig or lamb or whatever is used.  And, for sure, that choice is important, but we think a great pitmaster could turn just about anything handed to him into top-quality barbecue.  Which is why we’d pick The Cook as our second choice, and maybe we’d even change it to our first choice.

There’s our two cents.  Anyone else care to weigh in?

Comments

1/28/2010 5:04:11 PM #

Just because you have wood does not mean you will have great que.  Granted, great que does require some wood in the cooking in the process.  I looked at the poll thinking that I have all these items in front of me.  Now pick which is most important in the process.  That is why I picked the cook.  Even though you provide all the other items, if you don't have a good cook, you won't have a chance at great que.

John "RibDog" Verville United States |

1/29/2010 10:45:07 AM #

You should have used the phrase "The Technique" rather than "The Cook".

Para United States |

1/29/2010 11:02:27 AM #

Having eaten what is objectively good barbecue in New York City, but not enjoying it much (only partly because of the price, but mostly because the whole situation seemed bogus), I said "setting." Granted, you can have a fabulous place -- in Texas, North Carolina, or Memphis -- but if you don't have the right wood and meat, and a savvy pitmaster (and, in Memphis, sauce), the experience will stink. But I still would prefer visiting a wonderful place with mediocre barbecue than having great barbecue in the wrong setting. I and a solid 1% of Roadfood readers agree!

MS United States |

1/29/2010 12:20:53 PM #

What's the Most Important Feature In Great BBQ? Since "great BBQ" can't be achieved without wood, I thought that choice must refer to the type of wood (hickory, oak, apple, etc.). Kind of like your interpretation of the meat question. Rubs and sauces can be an important factor, especially if they're not to ones liking. The setting is, imho, the least important. A great pitmaster will take what he's got and turn out the best possible product. "The Cook" is definitely the best answer.  

Arthur D. Voorhees United States |

Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.5.0.7
Theme by Mads Kristensen

What is Roadfood?  |   Submit Content  |   Privacy Policy  |   Contact Roadfood.com   Copyright 2010 - Roadfood.com