The definitive resource for news, events and reviews of great regional food from around the country
 
Restaurants Recipes Digest Forums Merchandise FAQ Maps Insider


Which of These Chains is Most Roadfood-Worthy?

Posted by Bruce Bilmes and Sue Boyle , January 06, 2009 13:35

image

We recently polled Roadfood.com readers, asking them about the most Roadfood-worthy chains, and In-N-Out Burger just edged out Waffle House.  A close third place: the assertion that chains and Roadfood are mutually exclusive.  It’s a debate that will probably always occupy those interested in Roadfood.  Can a chain ever really be Roadfood?  Does the size of the chain matter?  Does it matter if they are independently owned or corporate owned?  Etc., etc. … There is no general answer; you have to make the call for yourself.

Incidentally, the chains in the poll were chosen because Jane and Michael Stern have, at one time or another, written favorably about them, which is not to say that they currently approve of all, or any, of these chains.  Well, maybe that’s not quite true: they currently have reviews on this site for In-N-Out Burger, Burgerville, Graeter’s, Maid-Rite, and Original Pancake House.  Our position: we reject chains on both principle (Roadfood is a celebration of the local cook as folk artist) and experience (the food and/or atmosphere is usually crappy).  But… we’re not dogmatic about it.  If something strikes us as Roadfood, then we’re not going to let labels and rules get in the way.  We resist chains as Roadfood, but we don’t flat-out reject them.

Our experiences with the chains in the poll: we’ve found Original Pancake House to be very variable in quality, both from branch to branch and dish to dish, but at its best it can be wonderful; we like Steak ‘N’ Shake, especially the shakes, perhaps because there are none near where we live, but they are definitely closer to fast food than Roadfood; Graeter’s is terrific; In-N-Out Burger is decent fast food but we’ve never understood the fuss; Runza serves a unique regional dish that we enjoy, but it’s certainly not the best version of the dish, and the rest of the menu is ordinary; and we are very fond of Rubio’s fish tacos.  Never been to the others (but we really like the way Waffle Houses look; there just have always been better options when we were near one).

Comments

1/6/2009 5:54:07 PM #

Bruce, I really appreciate your explanation.  We, too, eschew chains but cave in when there's no better option.  We shall not, however, darken the doorways of the top 5 fast-food chains.  We'd rather go hungry!  And Rubio's...their fish tacos are absolutely unavoidable (cue Homer Simpson mouth-watering sound)...

ayersian |

1/6/2009 6:41:09 PM #

Plus, Chris, how often do we get a fish taco here in the Northeast?  That adds to the fun when we're traveling.  Truth be told, we never actually have a meal at Rubio's.  We usually get a fish taco as a snack as we leave the airport in Rubio's country!

Steak 'N' Shake we've only been to two or three times, late at night when everything else was closed.  I say we but I mean me - Sue's not very interested, but if we've missed dinner because of a concert or something, I've been known to stop off for a burger and shake to bring back to the room.  Maybe it's the novelty but I think it's better than BK and MCD.

Bruce Bilmes and Sue Boyle |

6/28/2009 10:12:18 AM #

I will always defend Burgerville as a great exemplar of Pacific Northwest cuisine. And i have been surprised by the quality of Five Guys and In N Out. Rubio's wonderful but thought the quality was less in Portland than San Diego, Steak and Shake better than okay. Tend to think chains are not roadfood but i am not very dogmatic.

Mr Chips |

Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.6.1.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen

What is Roadfood?  |   Submit Content  |   Privacy Policy  |   Contact Roadfood.com   Copyright 2010 - Roadfood.com